When NOT to Migrate from Camunda 7 to Camunda 8
A Reality Check for Architects & Decision Makers
Introduction
With the marketing push around Camunda 8, many organizations feel pressure to migrate from Camunda 7 as soon as possible.
But here is the uncomfortable truth:
❗ Camunda 8 is not a drop-in upgrade.
❗ And migrating too early can be a strategic mistake.
Camunda 8 is a new, cloud-native, event-driven platform, not just “Camunda 7 with better scaling”.
This blog explains when you should NOT migrate yet — and why staying on Camunda 7 is often the smarter choice.
Quick Reality Check: Camunda 7 vs Camunda 8
| Aspect | Camunda 7 | Camunda 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Monolithic BPM engine | Distributed (Zeebe) |
| State storage | Relational DB | Distributed log |
| Transactions | ACID | Eventual consistency |
| Human tasks | Built-in | External Tasklist |
| External tasks | Optional | Mandatory pattern |
| Deployment | WAR / JAR | Kubernetes-native |
| Migration effort | Low | High |
👉 Camunda 8 is a platform rewrite, not a version upgrade.
1️⃣ You Rely on Strong ACID Transactions
Why NOT migrate
If your processes depend on:
-
Database-level rollback
-
Strong consistency
-
Multi-step transactional guarantees
-
Synchronous service tasks
Then Camunda 8 breaks your architectural assumptions.
Camunda 8 uses:
-
Event sourcing
-
Append-only logs
-
Eventual consistency
There is no true rollback — only compensation.
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate if ACID is critical to your business workflows.
2️⃣ You Have Heavy Human-Centric Workflows
Why NOT migrate
If your system is:
-
Human-task heavy
-
Built around Tasklist / Forms
-
Integrated with LDAP / SSO
-
Full of approval workflows
Then Camunda 7 is far more mature and feature-complete.
Camunda 8:
-
Treats human tasks as external events
-
Has fewer enterprise UI features
-
Requires more custom UI work
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate if your workflows are human-centric.
3️⃣ You Are Not Running Kubernetes
Why NOT migrate
Camunda 8 is:
-
Kubernetes-native
-
Cloud-first
-
Designed for distributed clusters
If your environment is:
-
On-premise
-
VM-based
-
Traditional app servers
-
No container orchestration
Then Camunda 8 introduces:
-
Massive operational complexity
-
New DevOps burden
-
Higher infrastructure cost
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate without Kubernetes maturity.
4️⃣ Your BPMN Models Use Synchronous Service Tasks
Why NOT migrate
Camunda 7 allows:
-
Synchronous service calls
-
Long-running logic inside the engine
Camunda 8 requires:
-
External workers
-
Async orchestration
-
Event-driven design
Your BPMN models will not work as-is.
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate if your BPMN relies on sync execution.
5️⃣ You Depend on Java Delegates & Embedded Logic
Why NOT migrate
Camunda 7:
-
Java Delegates
-
Execution listeners
-
Script tasks
-
Embedded Spring Beans
Camunda 8:
-
No embedded Java execution
-
Everything must be external
This means:
-
Massive refactoring
-
New services
-
New failure modes
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate if your processes embed Java logic.
6️⃣ You Have Many Running Production Instances
Why NOT migrate
Camunda 8 does not support live instance migration from Camunda 7.
That means:
-
No seamless cutover
-
No automatic state migration
-
Long dual-run period
-
High risk of data loss
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate with thousands of live instances.
7️⃣ You Need Strong Debugging & Operational Simplicity
Why NOT migrate
Camunda 7:
-
Easy debugging
-
Cockpit introspection
-
DB-centric observability
-
Simple rollback
Camunda 8:
-
Requires:
-
Operate
-
Elasticsearch
-
Zeebe tools
-
-
Distributed debugging
-
Event tracing
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate if your ops team is small or DB-centric.
8️⃣ Your Team Is Not Event-Driven Architecture Ready
Why NOT migrate
Camunda 8 assumes knowledge of:
-
Event sourcing
-
Asynchronous systems
-
Message-driven design
-
Distributed failures
Without this maturity:
-
Incidents increase
-
Debugging becomes painful
-
Stability suffers
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate without event-driven experience.
9️⃣ Your Current Camunda 7 System Is Stable
Why NOT migrate
If your current platform:
-
Is stable
-
Performs well
-
Meets business needs
-
Has no scaling bottleneck
Then migration brings:
-
Cost
-
Risk
-
Downtime
-
Complexity
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate just because marketing says so.
10️⃣ You Expect a “Lift-and-Shift” Migration
Why NOT migrate
There is no such thing as:
“Upgrade Camunda 7 → Camunda 8”
This is a full re-architecture.
Verdict
❌ Do not migrate if you expect a simple upgrade.
When SHOULD You Migrate (For Balance)
You should consider Camunda 8 if:
✔ You need massive horizontal scaling
✔ You are microservices-native
✔ You are Kubernetes-first
✔ You are building a new greenfield platform
✔ You accept eventual consistency
✔ You are ready for async workflows
Interview Question (Very Common)
Q: Is Camunda 8 a replacement for Camunda 7?
A: No. Camunda 8 is a different platform targeting different architectural problems.
Final Verdict
❗ Migrating from Camunda 7 to Camunda 8 too early is one of the most common BPM platform mistakes.
Camunda 8 is excellent for:
-
Cloud
-
Microservices
-
Event-driven orchestration
But it is not better for:
-
Transaction-heavy enterprise workflows
-
Human-centric processes
-
On-premise systems
-
DB-centric architectures
👉 Architecture maturity should drive migration — not product marketing.
💼 Professional Support Available
If you are facing issues in real projects related to enterprise backend development or workflow automation, I provide paid consulting, production debugging, project support, and focused trainings.
Technologies covered include Java, Spring Boot, PL/SQL, Azure, and workflow automation (jBPM, Camunda BPM, RHPAM).
📧 Contact: ishikhanirankari@gmail.com | info@realtechnologiesindia.com
🌐 Website: IT Trainings | Digital metal podium
Comments
Post a Comment