When NOT to Migrate from Camunda 7 to Camunda 8

A Reality Check for Architects & Decision Makers

Introduction

With the marketing push around Camunda 8, many organizations feel pressure to migrate from Camunda 7 as soon as possible.

But here is the uncomfortable truth:

Camunda 8 is not a drop-in upgrade.
And migrating too early can be a strategic mistake.

Camunda 8 is a new, cloud-native, event-driven platform, not just “Camunda 7 with better scaling”.

This blog explains when you should NOT migrate yet — and why staying on Camunda 7 is often the smarter choice.


Quick Reality Check: Camunda 7 vs Camunda 8

AspectCamunda 7Camunda 8
ArchitectureMonolithic BPM engineDistributed (Zeebe)
State storageRelational DBDistributed log
TransactionsACIDEventual consistency
Human tasksBuilt-inExternal Tasklist
External tasksOptionalMandatory pattern
DeploymentWAR / JARKubernetes-native
Migration effortLowHigh

👉 Camunda 8 is a platform rewrite, not a version upgrade.


1️⃣ You Rely on Strong ACID Transactions

Why NOT migrate

If your processes depend on:

  • Database-level rollback

  • Strong consistency

  • Multi-step transactional guarantees

  • Synchronous service tasks

Then Camunda 8 breaks your architectural assumptions.

Camunda 8 uses:

  • Event sourcing

  • Append-only logs

  • Eventual consistency

There is no true rollback — only compensation.

Verdict

Do not migrate if ACID is critical to your business workflows.


2️⃣ You Have Heavy Human-Centric Workflows

Why NOT migrate

If your system is:

  • Human-task heavy

  • Built around Tasklist / Forms

  • Integrated with LDAP / SSO

  • Full of approval workflows

Then Camunda 7 is far more mature and feature-complete.

Camunda 8:

  • Treats human tasks as external events

  • Has fewer enterprise UI features

  • Requires more custom UI work

Verdict

Do not migrate if your workflows are human-centric.


3️⃣ You Are Not Running Kubernetes

Why NOT migrate

Camunda 8 is:

  • Kubernetes-native

  • Cloud-first

  • Designed for distributed clusters

If your environment is:

  • On-premise

  • VM-based

  • Traditional app servers

  • No container orchestration

Then Camunda 8 introduces:

  • Massive operational complexity

  • New DevOps burden

  • Higher infrastructure cost

Verdict

Do not migrate without Kubernetes maturity.


4️⃣ Your BPMN Models Use Synchronous Service Tasks

Why NOT migrate

Camunda 7 allows:

  • Synchronous service calls

  • Long-running logic inside the engine

Camunda 8 requires:

  • External workers

  • Async orchestration

  • Event-driven design

Your BPMN models will not work as-is.

Verdict

Do not migrate if your BPMN relies on sync execution.


5️⃣ You Depend on Java Delegates & Embedded Logic

Why NOT migrate

Camunda 7:

  • Java Delegates

  • Execution listeners

  • Script tasks

  • Embedded Spring Beans

Camunda 8:

  • No embedded Java execution

  • Everything must be external

This means:

  • Massive refactoring

  • New services

  • New failure modes

Verdict

Do not migrate if your processes embed Java logic.


6️⃣ You Have Many Running Production Instances

Why NOT migrate

Camunda 8 does not support live instance migration from Camunda 7.

That means:

  • No seamless cutover

  • No automatic state migration

  • Long dual-run period

  • High risk of data loss

Verdict

Do not migrate with thousands of live instances.


7️⃣ You Need Strong Debugging & Operational Simplicity

Why NOT migrate

Camunda 7:

  • Easy debugging

  • Cockpit introspection

  • DB-centric observability

  • Simple rollback

Camunda 8:

  • Requires:

    • Operate

    • Elasticsearch

    • Zeebe tools

  • Distributed debugging

  • Event tracing

Verdict

Do not migrate if your ops team is small or DB-centric.


8️⃣ Your Team Is Not Event-Driven Architecture Ready

Why NOT migrate

Camunda 8 assumes knowledge of:

  • Event sourcing

  • Asynchronous systems

  • Message-driven design

  • Distributed failures

Without this maturity:

  • Incidents increase

  • Debugging becomes painful

  • Stability suffers

Verdict

Do not migrate without event-driven experience.


9️⃣ Your Current Camunda 7 System Is Stable

Why NOT migrate

If your current platform:

  • Is stable

  • Performs well

  • Meets business needs

  • Has no scaling bottleneck

Then migration brings:

  • Cost

  • Risk

  • Downtime

  • Complexity

Verdict

Do not migrate just because marketing says so.


10️⃣ You Expect a “Lift-and-Shift” Migration

Why NOT migrate

There is no such thing as:

“Upgrade Camunda 7 → Camunda 8”

This is a full re-architecture.

Verdict

Do not migrate if you expect a simple upgrade.


When SHOULD You Migrate (For Balance)

You should consider Camunda 8 if:

✔ You need massive horizontal scaling
✔ You are microservices-native
✔ You are Kubernetes-first
✔ You are building a new greenfield platform
✔ You accept eventual consistency
✔ You are ready for async workflows


Interview Question (Very Common)

Q: Is Camunda 8 a replacement for Camunda 7?
A: No. Camunda 8 is a different platform targeting different architectural problems.


Final Verdict

Migrating from Camunda 7 to Camunda 8 too early is one of the most common BPM platform mistakes.

Camunda 8 is excellent for:

  • Cloud

  • Microservices

  • Event-driven orchestration

But it is not better for:

  • Transaction-heavy enterprise workflows

  • Human-centric processes

  • On-premise systems

  • DB-centric architectures

👉 Architecture maturity should drive migration — not product marketing.


💼 Professional Support Available

If you are facing issues in real projects related to enterprise backend development or workflow automation, I provide paid consulting, production debugging, project support, and focused trainings.

Technologies covered include Java, Spring Boot, PL/SQL, Azure, and workflow automation (jBPM, Camunda BPM, RHPAM).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

jBPM Installation Guide: Step by Step Setup

Scopes of Signal in jBPM

OOPs Concepts in Java | English | Object Oriented Programming Explained