Camunda 7 vs Camunda 8 – What’s the Difference and Which One Should You Use?
Camunda now exists in two major generations:
-
Camunda 7 → The classic BPMN engine used widely in enterprises
-
Camunda 8 → A new, cloud-native, distributed platform designed for scalability
Although they share the Camunda brand and BPMN/DMN support, they are fundamentally different products, built for very different architectures and teams.
This blog explains all differences — architecture, deployment, scalability, features, expression languages, modelers, databases, multi-tenancy, and when to choose which version.
⭐ 1. High-Level Summary
✔ Camunda 7:
"Traditional, monolithic, relational DB–based BPM engine"
Ideal for Java enterprise apps, on-prem deployments, synchronous workflows, and human task systems.
✔ Camunda 8:
"Cloud-native, distributed, microservices-based workflow platform"
Ideal for scalable, event-driven, asynchronous, high-volume workflows running on Kubernetes or cloud.
⭐ 2. Architecture Comparison
Camunda 7 Architecture
-
Monolithic engine
-
Runs inside Java application (embedded) or as shared/remote engine
-
Uses relational databases (ACID transactions)
-
Suitable for synchronous operations
-
Strong BPMN & human task features
Camunda 8 Architecture
-
Distributed microservices-based engine (Zeebe)
-
Stateless brokers + partitions
-
Cloud-native, Kubernetes-oriented
-
Always asynchronous & event-driven
-
Scales horizontally like Kafka
⭐ 3. Detailed Feature Comparison (Including Your Provided Table)
| Feature | Camunda 7 | Camunda 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Monolithic, classic application server model | Distributed microservices (Zeebe) |
| Deployment | Embedded, shared, or remote engine | Remote, cloud-native engine only |
| Scalability | Limited by database + JVM | Horizontally scalable & resilient |
| Task Processing | Supports synchronous & asynchronous execution | Always asynchronous, event-driven |
| Database | Requires relational DB (Postgres, MySQL, Oracle) | Uses a document-based storage and log-based engine |
| Modeler | Desktop Modeler (local files, less collaboration) | Built-in Web Modeler with team collaboration |
| User Tools | Cockpit & Tasklist (limited in free version) | Full suite: Operate, Tasklist, Web Modeler, Optimize |
| Expression Language | JUEL (Java Unified Expression Language) | FEEL (Friendly-Enough Expression Language) |
| Multi-tenancy | One engine per tenant | multi-tenancy model did not support the same way |
| Workflow Execution | Transactional, ACID guarantees | Eventually consistent, event sourced |
| Integration Style | Java Delegates inside engine | External Worker architecture |
| Use Case | Human workflows, enterprise automation | High-scale, distributed microservices orchestration |
⭐ 4. Processing Model Differences
Camunda 7 – Transactional BPM Engine
✔ Supports synchronous execution
✔ Java delegates run inside the engine
✔ Database-backed state
✔ ACID, ideal for enterprise human workflows
✔ Can orchestrate business logic tightly coupled with Spring Boot
Camunda 8 – Event-Driven Workflow Engine
✔ 100% asynchronous
✔ Workers pull tasks from engine
✔ Scales massively (millions of messages/days)
✔ Excellent for distributed systems
✔ Built for Kubernetes, cloud scaling
⭐ 5. Modeler & Development Experience
Camunda 7
-
Uses desktop Camunda Modeler
-
BPMN/DMN editing is local
-
No real-time collaboration
-
Scripting uses JUEL
-
Embedded engine makes debugging easy
Camunda 8
-
Has a modern Web Modeler (browser-based)
-
Real-time collaboration like Google Docs
-
Versioning & publishing built-in
-
Uses FEEL for rules and mapping
-
Perfect for distributed teams
⭐ 6. Runtime & Operations Tools
Camunda 7 Tools
✔ Tasklist
✔ Cockpit
✔ Admin
❗ In free edition: Limited features
✔ On-prem installations simple
Camunda 8 Tools
✔ Operate (monitor workflow instances)
✔ Tasklist (new UI)
✔ Optimize (analytics)
✔ Web Modeler
✔ Connectors
✔ Managed SaaS option
Much more modern & cloud oriented.
⭐ 7. Real Database vs No Database
Camunda 7
Uses a relational database to store:
-
BPMN state
-
Job locks
-
Incidents
-
User tasks
-
Historic data
This makes ACID transactions possible.
Camunda 8
Uses:
-
Event log for workflow state
-
Document store for metadata
-
No relational DB for runtime
-
High throughput, but no ACID across services
⭐ 8. When Should You Choose Camunda 7?
Choose Camunda 7 if:
✔ You need ACID transactions tightly integrated with application code
✔ You prefer an embedded or shared Java engine
✔ Your workflows have moderate scale
✔ Your relational DB is not a bottleneck
✔ Your team is Java/Spring Boot heavy
✔ You want free, production-ready Tasklist & Cockpit
✔ You have complex human workflows
✔ You want a traditional BPM platform
Best for:
-
Banking portals
-
Government workflows
-
Insurance case management
-
Loan & claims processing
-
On-prem enterprise systems
⭐ 9. When Should You Choose Camunda 8?
Choose Camunda 8 if:
✔ You need a cloud-native, horizontally scalable engine
✔ Your workflow involves high-volume distributed transactions
✔ You want a collaborative, web-based modeler
✔ You want built-in connectors for quick integrations
✔ You prefer microservices & event-driven architecture
✔ You want Kubernetes-native deployment
✔ You want resilience without manual DB tuning
✔ You don’t rely on Java Delegates
Best for:
-
Microservices orchestration
-
Event-driven systems
-
Logistics, IoT, streaming
-
High-throughput automation
-
Cloud/SaaS products
-
Global-scale workflow processing
⭐ 10. Simple Recommendation (Decision Guide)
| If your architecture is… | Use |
|---|---|
| Java/Spring Boot monolith or modular | Camunda 7 |
| Cloud-native microservices on Kubernetes | Camunda 8 |
| Enterprise human workflows | Camunda 7 |
| High-volume, distributed automation | Camunda 8 |
| Need ACID transactions | Camunda 7 |
| Need massive horizontal scaling | Camunda 8 |
| Prefer desktop modeler | Camunda 7 |
| Prefer web-based collaborative modeling | Camunda 8 |
⭐ 11. Summary Table
| Category | Camunda 7 | Camunda 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | Monolithic, DB-backed | Distributed, log-based |
| Scaling | Medium | Very high |
| Processing | Sync + async | Async only |
| Integration | Java Delegates | External Workers |
| Modeling | Desktop tool | Collaborative Web Modeler |
| Transactions | ACID | Eventually consistent |
| Use Cases | Human workflows | Microservices orchestration |
| Deployment | App server, on-prem | Cloud-native, SaaS |
🎉 Conclusion
Camunda 7 and Camunda 8 both deliver world-class BPMN automation — but for two different generations of architecture.
✔ Choose Camunda 7
If your world is Java, relational DB, ACID, synchronous operations, and human workflows.
✔ Choose Camunda 8
If your world is cloud-native, Kubernetes, event-driven, high throughput, and distributed microservices.
Bottom line:
Your system architecture decides which Camunda version is right for you.
💼 Professional Support Available
If you are facing issues in real projects related to enterprise backend development or workflow automation, I provide paid consulting, production debugging, project support, and focused trainings.
Technologies covered include Java, Spring Boot, PL/SQL, Azure, and workflow automation (jBPM, Camunda BPM, RHPAM).
📧 Contact: ishikhanirankari@gmail.com | info@realtechnologiesindia.com
🌐 Website: IT Trainings | Digital metal podium
Comments
Post a Comment