Camunda 8 Connectors vs Workers – What's the Difference and When to Use Which?

In Camunda 8, all work is executed outside the workflow engine.

There are two main ways to integrate external systems and execute logic:

  1. Camunda 8 Connectors (pre-built, configuration-driven)

  2. Camunda 8 Job Workers (custom code-based workers)

Both are built on top of Zeebe's job mechanism, but they serve very different purposes.

This blog explains:

  • What Connectors and Workers are

  • How they work internally

  • Key differences

  • Real-world examples

  • When to use Connectors vs Workers

  • Best practices


⭐ 1. Big Picture: Execution Model in Camunda 8

Camunda 8 is:

  • Cloud-native

  • Event-driven

  • Asynchronous only

👉 The engine never executes business logic itself.
👉 All work is done by external executors.

Both Connectors and Workers are:

  • External

  • Asynchronous

  • Decoupled from the engine

  • Scalable


⭐ 2. What Are Camunda 8 Connectors?

Connectors are pre-built integration components provided by Camunda.

They allow you to connect BPMN processes to external systems without writing code.

🔹 Key Characteristics

✔ Configuration-based (no custom coding)
✔ Use forms and properties in Web Modeler
✔ Run as managed workers
✔ Follow best practices out of the box
✔ Ideal for common integrations

🔹 Common Built-in Connectors

  • HTTP Connector

  • REST API Connector

  • Kafka Connector

  • Slack Connector

  • Email Connector

  • AWS / Azure connectors

  • Google Sheets, Webhooks, etc.


⭐ 3. Example: HTTP Connector (No Code)

In BPMN:

  • Add a Service Task

  • Select Connector as implementation

  • Choose HTTP Connector

Configuration example:

Method: POST URL: https://api.example.com/approve Headers: Authorization: Bearer {{token}} Body: {{requestPayload}}

✔ No Java / Node code
✔ Easy to maintain
✔ Business-friendly


⭐ 4. What Are Camunda 8 Job Workers?

Job Workers are custom programs (Java, Node.js, Go, Python) that:

  • Subscribe to a job type

  • Pull jobs from Zeebe

  • Execute custom logic

  • Complete or fail jobs

🔹 Key Characteristics

✔ Full control over logic
✔ Written in code
✔ Can call multiple systems
✔ Can implement complex orchestration
✔ Fully customizable retry logic


⭐ 5. Example: Custom Job Worker (Java)

client.newWorker() .jobType("validate-payment") .handler((jobClient, job) -> { Map<String, Object> vars = job.getVariablesAsMap(); // custom business logic jobClient.newCompleteCommand(job.getKey()).send(); }) .open();

✔ Custom validation
✔ Advanced error handling
✔ Complex business rules


⭐ 6. Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureConnectorsWorkers
SetupNo-code / low-codeCode-based
LanguageConfig onlyJava, Node, Go, Python
ComplexityLow–MediumMedium–High
Custom logicLimitedUnlimited
ReusabilityHighHigh (with code reuse)
MaintenanceLowMedium–High
PerformanceOptimizedDepends on implementation
Error handlingBuilt-inCustom
Best forCommon integrationsComplex logic

⭐ 7. Error Handling & Retries

🔹 Connectors

✔ Built-in retry handling
✔ Standardized error reporting
✔ Simpler failure configuration

🔹 Workers

✔ Custom retry strategies
✔ Circuit breakers
✔ Fallback logic
✔ Advanced observability


⭐ 8. Security Differences

Connectors

  • Secrets managed centrally

  • Safer for credentials

  • Less risk of leaking keys

Workers

  • Full control, but full responsibility

  • Must manage secrets securely

  • Better for enterprise security policies


⭐ 9. When Should You Use Connectors?

Choose Connectors if:

✔ You want fast implementation
✔ Integration is simple or standard
✔ You want low maintenance
✔ You prefer configuration over code
✔ Business teams model workflows
✔ You use Camunda Web Modeler
✔ You want built-in best practices

Typical use cases:

  • REST/HTTP calls

  • Sending emails

  • Slack notifications

  • Webhooks

  • Simple Kafka publishing


⭐ 10. When Should You Use Workers?

Choose Workers if:

✔ You need custom business logic
✔ Multiple system calls are required
✔ Complex transformations are needed
✔ Advanced error handling is required
✔ You want full control over execution
✔ You already have microservices
✔ You need high performance tuning

Typical use cases:

  • Payment processing

  • Fraud detection

  • Aggregation logic

  • Legacy system integration

  • Long-running orchestration


⭐ 11. Best Practice: Combine Both

👉 Real-world Camunda 8 systems use both:

  • Connectors for:

    • Simple integrations

    • Notifications

    • Standard APIs

  • Workers for:

    • Core business logic

    • Domain-specific rules

    • Complex orchestration

This gives:
✔ Faster development
✔ Cleaner BPMN
✔ Lower maintenance cost
✔ Better scalability


⭐ 12. Common Mistakes to Avoid

❌ Using Workers for simple HTTP calls
❌ Overloading Connectors with complex logic
❌ Hardcoding secrets in Workers
❌ Ignoring retry & timeout strategies
❌ Treating Camunda 8 like Camunda 7


🎉 Conclusion

In Camunda 8:

  • Connectors = fast, low-code, standardized integrations

  • Workers = powerful, flexible, code-driven execution

👉 Simple rule:

  • Simple integration → Connector

  • Complex logic → Worker

  • Enterprise systems → Both together

Understanding when to use Connectors vs Workers is key to building scalable, maintainable, cloud-native workflows with Camunda 8.

💼 Professional Support Available

If you are facing issues in real projects related to enterprise backend development or workflow automation, I provide paid consulting, production debugging, project support, and focused trainings.

Technologies covered include Java, Spring Boot, PL/SQL, Azure, and workflow automation (jBPM, Camunda BPM, RHPAM).




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

jBPM Installation Guide: Step by Step Setup

Scopes of Signal in jBPM

OOPs Concepts in Java | English | Object Oriented Programming Explained